Since the days of highly talked about local plays in small, stone  amphitheaters where villagers gathered in gleeful anticipation, our  levels of societal sophistication have been worn on the sleeves of our  entertainment. Entertainment, as we know it in film, is not merely an  inconsequential time away from reality. Entertainment is a gauge by  which our society can be judged. 
To some small degree,  the forms of entertainment we seek out and appreciate can determine our  level of morality. We look back and sneer at the Romans for watching  people die horribly in an arena in the days of the Caesars. But are we  really that much further along when we find great fascination in  watching brutal combat matches and videos of children hurting other  children online? Our desire to bet on the outcome of cock fights and pit  bull match-ups show us that we have changed for the better only a  little in recent times. Based on our preferences of entertainment alone,  any extraterrestrial observers of our world would have a good idea of  whether or not we would be hostile to them if they made themselves  known. 
I don’t recall who said it, but the saying is true: “Nothing says more about humanity than the games she plays.”  Movies are not only indicators of our spiritual, intellectual, and  social levels of awareness, but will always serve as time capsules as  they say so much about us and our species. The movies we watch testify  to our ideologies regarding the religious myths we hold to be true and  other convictions that will one day be thought obsolete. Television and  movies alike act as parallel testimonies to our vast and pervasive  ignorance.
The dedicated film critic is separate from  the devoted film fan primarily in that it is not the serious fan’s  obligation to explore these issues. It is the critic’s mission to  explore them exhaustively, but both have one thing in common—not  necessarily opinions, but the belief that there is a level of  objectivity when it comes to the merits of determining a “good” or “bad”  film. The careful critic and ardent fan are one and the same in that  they both realize that film criticism is not meaningless, nor is it  created by someone writing merely to express their own personal likes or  dislikes. 
Film criticism is an art, an art like any  other, which involves a principled methodology (however abstractly  conceived), intelligence, cultural awareness, and psychology. For this  reason, reviewing a film in the time in which it emerged is crucial.  When reviewing a new film, the critic asks: What does it contribute to  the body of works presently available in a particular genre(s)? Does it  do what so many other works have done before it? Does it do it better?  Does it tread new ground? Will it become influential in society? Will it  influence thinking in times to come? Will it make us question some  previously held conviction(s)? Chiefly, does it do well what it sets out  to do? 
The study of film is, in essence, a look at  how well human behavior and nature can be duplicated or examined. We  want reality to give us fantasy, but we expect fantasy to tell us more  about ourselves in reality (at least we expect as much subconsciously).  We know this because we call out bad fantasy when it fails to relate  sufficiently to known reality. What we want to do is to predict  ourselves and reduce to terms most familiar to us the encapsulated  meaning of our lives. We want to understand ourselves better. We want to  know what lies ahead, as well as what we are leaving behind in terms of  our personal evolution.  
To a great extent, it is  film criticism that deals with the core attributes of what it means to  be human. When audiences watch movies, they look for different things.  Some look for novelty, some for cosmetic concerns and vanities. Some are  impressed with technology. Some like to see impressive-but-primal  displays of power and violence. Some want to see love, but all are  looking to receive back a portion of the human experience to which they  can relate. The film critic makes this his work. The film critic simply  expects a return much greater than that of the average moviegoer. 
For  as much as we want to waste time and revel in the fantastic and  impossible – laughing at parody, gawking at absurdity, being brought to  tears in tales of trauma, true or false – we want to be touched by the  moments of life portrayed, including the most awful and painful ones.  Entertainment, then, could be called a preferential form of  spirituality, not unlike a worship service. 
In  addition to providing what amounts to a spiritual form of nourishment,  movies misinform us, deceive us, and show us our limitations. But movies  can do nothing of themselves. They are only a mirror, reflecting back  the net result of what we have put into them, being only what we created  them to be in light of our perception of the world (or how we wish it  to be). The quest to understand ourselves through movies is a search, a  search of memory, a look at history, a motivation to learn more about  philosophy and the sciences. In this exhilarating search, we learn to  appreciate the limitations of our knowledge, principles, and our minds. 
It  is through devotion to film that our imaginations are allowed to soar  to increasingly greater heights. We learn to accept our limitations or  be confounded by our utter lack of growth and stunning shortsightedness.  Movies can consume us and make us profoundly unhappy if we watch them  to escape from reality and hide inside, instead of as a river in an  outward channel, with waters that lead us back to a rippled-but-telling  image of ourselves and our society. 
The study of film  is a search for what speaks to the human experience. We want a better  grasp on what it means to be human. We demonstrate through the pursuit  of entertainment that we do not yet, as a species, understand ourselves,  which is why we want to share our hurts and our happiness, and  everything that underlies what it means to be called finite. We want to  be patted on the back and to know that we are not alone in our  experiences and trials. In so doing, we go within and beyond who we are  in efforts to better ascertain who we want to be.
(JH)
 
 
